The team selection process for the Fall 2011 National Health Law Moot Court Competition will begin April 11th.
One team of two or three students will be selected. Students who apply must be willing to make a substantial time commitment during the Fall of 2011.
Team members can earn up two credit hours for writing the brief and participating in the Competition, and the experience may be used to fulfill the law school’s skills requirement.
The Competition emphasizes health law, but the problem often involves constitutional, procedural and/or statutory interpretation issues.
Application information will be available April 4th.If you have questions, please contact Jennifer Monarch at email@example.com.
Congratulations to Kate Barnes, Reed Troutman, and Cathy Barnes whose notes were chosen for publication in the JLE's April 2011 issue. Although the majority of states have a clause in their constitution establishing a free system of public schools, judicial interpretations of this clause varies across states.
Kate’s notes discusses the range of judicial interpretations and concludes that a broad interpretation, supplying educational materials and supplies without fees, is the only interpretation that meets the objective to provide all children equal access to education. Her note is entitled "‘Free’ Education: The Inclusion of Educational Materials and Supplies as Part of the Right to Free Education."
Reed’s note describes the recent advancement in school food law with the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act in December 2010. Barriers to its implementation are discussed. The note concludes in support of subsidy elimination as a way to further improve the nutritional choices available to school children. His note is entitled "Health Food Advocacy and the National School Lunch Program.”
Cathy’s note describes the potential impact of the Race to the Top program which was created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. With education policy historically being a state and local matter, the Race to the Top program, the largest competitive education grant program in U.S. history which makes funding contingent upon adoption of national standards, is viewed as coercive. It is suggested that other measures which place school funding decisions with parents will be more effective than federal programs in reforming schools. Her note is entitled "‘Race to the Top’ Only Benefits Big Government."
Members of the Law Review’s editorial board for next year will be in the mosaic lobby on Thursday (Mar. 31) from 11:30 to 1:00 to answer any questions about the application and selection process and to distribute applications. Any interested person who stops by to pick up an application will also be given a dessert-type treat.
Applications are due May 11th by 9 pm outside the Law Review office (rm. 238). If you have any questions about the application or selection process, please contract Elisabeth Fitzpatrick or JD Theiss.
On March 24, Kentucky's Court of Appeals heard Jacob Gingerich v. Commonwealth of Kentucky in the law school's Allen Courtroom. The appeal from district court convictions is for failing to display a slow moving vehicles emblem on horse drawn buggies. The Amish appellants claim KRS 189.820 impermissibly burdens their religious freedoms.
Brian A. Smith, 1L, covered the First District Court trial for The Mayfield Messenger. His photographs were also published in The Courier-Journal.
"Amish residents argue against using 'slow moving' sign on buggies" (WHAS11, March 24)
Are you interested in becoming a member of the Journal of Law and Education (JLE)? While further developing your legal research and writing skills and contributing to the continued success of the journal, you can earn JLE membership status, earn academic credit, satisfy the law school’s writing requirement, write an excellent student note and be published, and increase your knowledge on current key issues in education law. Find out the details by stopping by the JLE’s informational table on Wednesday, March 30th in the Mosaic Lobby from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Applications will be available during this time.
Afterward, applications will be available by the student mailboxes. Applications are due April 14th by 5:00 p.m.
Barristers’ Ball tickets will be on sale beginning Wednesday, March 30th. The Student Bar Association will be sponsoring a Panera Bread Breakfast in the Mosaic Lobby from 9-11am. Tickets will be on sale at the table or through your SBA Class Representatives for $20 each.
All students who purchase tickets during the first week of sales (Wednesday, March 30th- Friday, April 1st) will be entered into a raffle for a variety of prizes including 2 iPod shuffles and various Louisville gear. The raffle winners will be announced on Monday, April 4th in the Student Organizations Bulletin.
Students are encouraged to bring a guest and can purchase up to 1 additional guest ticket for $20. Purchase of a guest ticket however does equate to an additional chance in the raffle. Tickets will be available for pre-sale up to Thursday, April 7th in either the Lobby or through a Student Representative. Tickets will also be on sale at the door the night of the event for $30 each.
Barristers’ Ball will be held Friday, April 8th from 8pm-Midnight at the Historic Henry Clay in Downtown Louisville. Beverages and Hor D’oeuvres will be provided. Proper dress for the evening is Cocktail attire. Entrance into the event will require the physical ticket and a valid form of identification.
For more information or to purchase tickets, contact your SBA Class Representative, Social Chair Molly MacCaskey, or Public Relations Chair, Chris Robert. Additional information can be found on the facebook event page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=203282416366743
Come hear three successful international business law practitioners share their stories of how they built successful careers right here in Louisville, Wednesday at 12:10 in room 075. We will be joined by Prof. Robert Brown of Greenbaum, Doll and McDonald, Mr. Dennis Clare, and Mr. L. Srinivasan of CGN Business Performance Consulting. Come with questions. Pizza will be provided.
Although the team did not advance to the final rounds, they competed very hard and impressed the judges in the preliminary rounds with their poise, strong oratory ability, and broad knowledge of the competition's complicated subject matter.
The Brandeis School of Law is proud of Marlow and Jennifer!