Professor Warren is proud to announce the selection of UofL's representatives in the 2011 Kaufman Memorial Securities Moot Court Competition: Jennifer Monarch and Marlow Riedling.The competitors will be traveling to New York City in March of 2011 to compete against schools from around the country. Congratulations Jennifer and Marlow!
This event is co-sponsored by the Diversity Committee and the Student Health Law Association and is free and open to all. Complimentary pizza, provided by MHAKY, will be available at 11:30 AM outside of Room 275. Please bring your own drink.
Congratulations to Courtney Phelps, winner of the 2010 Pirtle-Washer Oral Advocacy Competition! He and Marilyn Osborn Patterson advanced from the semifinal rounds to compete in the final.
Ben Basil, VP for Internal Affairs of the Moot Court Board, organized the competition; Aaron Dyke and Jared Sawyer were bailiffs; and Karen Jordan served as the faculty advisor.
The pairings for the Semi-Finals were as follows:
- Whitney True, Appellant v. Courtney Phelps, Appellee
- Thomas Stevens, Appellant v. Marilyn Osborn, Appellee
- Judge Denise Clayton, Kentucky Court of Appeals
- Judge Thomas B. Wine, Kentucky Court of Appeals
- Judge Angela McCormick Bisig, Jefferson District Court
- Judge Katie King, Jefferson District Court
- Justice Lisabeth Hughes Abramson, Kentucky Supreme Court
- Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer, United States District Court
- Chief Circuit Judge Charles R. HIckman, Kentucky Circuit Court
- Judge Ann Bailey Smith, Jefferson District Court
Law school classmates are sometimes the hardest to say “no” to because they are adept at arguing that not studying is reasonable. After all, if they can convince someone else to waste time, their own wasting time isn’t as obvious.
Instead, walk away from temptation. Focus on one day at a time. All you can ask of yourself is your best. Work as hard as you can each day while allowing time for meals and sleep. Then, you can go to bed knowing that you did all you could do that day.
Bad advice: You can’t do any practice questions until right before the exam because you don’t know enough. Why this advice is bad advice:
- Exams are all about applying the concepts and law that you have learned all semester to new fact scenarios or legal problems.
- You wouldn’t run a 26.2 mile marathon without lots of training and practice. Why would you go into a law school exam without having worked on several practice questions throughout the semester?
- A multitude of practice questions are available that test your knowledge on sub-topics and topics and not just entire courses.
- Do some practice questions at the end of each sub-topic to test your application skills. Can you spot the issues and sub-issues? Can you apply the concepts correctly? Can you apply the rules and exceptions to the rules?
- Practice your approach to questions: how will you analyze the question; how will you marshal the facts; how will you organize your answer; how will you write the answer in the most concise way.
- Become more adept by starting with one-issue questions, then progressing to two- or three-issue questions, then progressing to more extensive questions. Once you can organize and answer shorter questions, you can practice your organization for longer questions.
- Use multiple sources of questions: questions handed out by the professor; questions in study aids; questions you and your study partners write and swap; questions from prior exams.
- Schedule practice question time each week for each course so that you do not forget to practice or put off practice too long.