Moot Court Board News
“I would like to congratulate the arbitration competition team on their great performance at the ABA arbitration competition this past weekend. It was the first time each member of the team had competed, yet they managed to secure an arbitrator judge’s vote in each of the two rounds. Their evaluation forms include many positive comments. Here are some highlights. Lily Chan and Josh Speirs prepared a “well organized” opening statement and summation. They made “good use of evidence” and gave a “well done professional and ethical presentation.” Mike McIntire’s direct examination included “good chronological organization of questions and proof,” and on cross he did well by showing “possible bias.” His partner, Colleen Goodman, gave a “superior” opening with “great organization” and a “good timeline” that was “great on remedies.” All participants were repeatedly congratulated on how well-prepared their witnesses were. I have every expectation that next year Lily and Josh will make use of their experience to advance the team to the semi-finals.”
To sign up, send an e-mail to Professor Zanewicz's assistant at email@example.com containing the following items in pdf format:
- Statement of interest (1 page maximum)
- Writing sample (brief, memo, etc.)
The deadline for submission of these items is Wednesday, Nov. 19 at 5:00. Professor Zanewicz will review the submissions and, if necessary, conduct interviews the following week to select team members.
Currently, only one team of two members is allowed in the competition from each school.
Direct any questions to Barry Dunn or Bryant Smith.
The Moot Court Board wishes good Luck to Joshua Speirs, Lily Chan, Colleen Goodman, and Michael McIntire who are competing in the regional 2008-09 ABA Law Student Division Regional Arbitration Competition this weekend in Highland Heights, KY.
See the National Aribtration Forum Blog for updates.
“One of our teams, composed of third-year student Steve Mattingly and second-year Brian Stempien, were recognized for writing the Best Brief in the tournament. This was the second time in the last three years that one of our teams has won this award. Writing the best brief of the 21 teams in the competition positioned Steve and Brian to then win both of their preliminary rounds on Friday (beating teams from George Mason and William & Mary), and advance into the quarterfinal round on Saturday morning.
There, they defeated the defending regional champions from Campbell University, to advance to the semi-finals where they faced a team from Duke. In an extremely close and high-quality round, they were knocked out by a slim two-point margin. Overall, it was the most successful performance by any U of L team in the history of the competition.
We were also very well-represented by a team made up entirely of second-year students, Barry Dunn and Duffy Trager. They went 1-1 on Friday, including a win over a team from Wake Forest, and just missed out on a tie-breaker from advancing to the quarterfinals.
It was a great performance, and I was extremely proud of the way all four of them represented the law school.”
The Securities Law Moot Court team is still accepting applications for team membership. The deadline has been extended to Friday, November 14th. Contact Will Corrigan (firstname.lastname@example.org) or Adam Stotts (email@example.com) for details.