Professor Sam Marcosson was quoted in an article in Time magazine, "A Gay-Marriage Lawsuit Dares to Make Its Case" (January 5, 2010). The article was written by Michael A. Lindenberger, a 2006 graduate of the University of Louisville's Brandeis School of Law.
"The stakes are extremely high," adds law professor Samuel Marcosson of the University of Louisville, author of Original Sin: Clarence Thomas and the Failure of the Constitutional Conservatives. "I think the plaintiffs are (unfortunately) very likely to lose — at least if the case makes it all the way to the Supreme Court — and set a precedent that didn't need to be, and shouldn't have been, set. The case was premature and ill-advised."
Here are some highlights from the December 2009 issue of the Louisville Bar Association's monthly Bar Briefs publication.
- Of Time and the Circle by Dean Chen (page 6)
- Law Students Attend Equal Justice Works Conference (page 7)
A copy is available in the library's reserves.
Friday, January 8, 2010, is the last day to add a class.
February 26, 2010, is the last day to withdraw from a class, but if you withdraw from a class after Friday, January 8, a W will show on your transcript.
Thursday, January 28, 2010, is the last day to apply for a May 2010 degree.
ULink, Student Services, under Degree Information - Degree Application
The law school and law library have re-opened for the spring 2010 semester and are operating under normal business hours.
Happy New Years!
Welcome back. The new year brings some important technology changes for students.
Goodbye, Lawnet; Hello, Active Directory
Lawnet is now dead for students. Students must use their ULink credentials now to log on to Law Library lab computers and to connect to their storage space on the file server and to the laptop printer. Come see the IT staff for assistance connecting to the file server and laptop printer.
New Wireless Network
At the end of last semester, University IT installed a brand new wireless network in the law school building, replacing the 19 access points we had with 53 new ones, covering the entire building. Other than being faster, more reliable and generally awesome, the new network should be transparent to students. However, if you have connection problems, come see the IT staff. Some students with Windows XP computers may experience problems.
Grades for the fall semester are in. Were you pleasantly surprised or dismally disappointed or somewhere in-between? Regardless of your situation, most every student can benefit by participating in an exam review with their professor. No one gets a perfect score on a law school exam and there is always room for improvement. Below are some tips for having a productive exam review:
- Be very clear about the professor's requirements. Some professors have specific dates and times when they will hold exam reviews with students. If you are unsure of a professor's availability, send him or her an email.
- Before you meet with a professor to do a formal exam review, request to see a copy of the exam. Doing your own assessment will help you prepare your thoughts before meeting with the professor. You will be amazed by what you notice about the exam question and your answer when you can look at it without the stress and time pressure of an exam period.
- Come to the meeting with only one thing in mind - learning from past experience and gaining from professional reaction to your product. Do not expect that this meeting with lead to a grade change.
- Take an active role in the meeting. Do not expect a packaged answer from the professor, pinpointing your precise strengths and weaknesses. The following questions, if you ask them consistently, can identify trends in your exam-taking:
- Did I misread the instructions for the exam?
- Did I spot the important issues?
- Did I miss important issues entirely?
- Did I display the rule/test/framework/standard properly and clearly?
- Did I adequately explain exceptions and/or counter arguments?
- Did I organize my answer based upon what was asked in the call of the question?
- Did I thoroughly develop the analysis/application? Did I explain each step of my legal analysis?
- Did I explore the facts of the question thoroughly in light of the legal principles and issues that I identified?
- What ways could the answer have been better organized?
- Did I make unwarranted assumptions in order to reach my conclusion?
- What aspects of my exam were strong?
Take a hard look at your performance last semester. Be honest with yourself about what worked and what did not work. Give yourself credit for your study strategies that were efficient and effective. Admit what study strategies were disasters. If you did not put in enough effort, own up to it. If you procrastinated, own up to it. To improve this semester, you must know your strengths, be honest about your weaknesses, and rigorous in your time management.
On December 24, the US Senate confirmed the nomination of Michael Khouri, '80, as commissioner of the Federal Maritime Commission. He currently practices transportation and maritime law with Pedley & Gordinier PLLC in Louisville, KY.